Call: 01392 678082

Established 2004

Ruddlesden geotechnical

Ruddlesden geotechnical provides ground investigation, geotechnical consultancy and contamination assessment services.

Based in Exeter, but covering the whole of the UK, albeit primarily concentrated in the South West, Ruddlesden geotechnical was formed in 2004.

Ruddlesden geotechnical works on behalf of a wide client base, including local, regional and national housing developers, housing associations, commercial developers, building contractors, structural and civil engineers, architects, building consultants, quantity surveyors, local authorities and private individuals.

Development projects range from single dwellings and extensions to large housing estates, multi-storey flats, offices, industrial units, roads, slopes, schools, hospitals and basements.

The services and projects listed on this web-site provide an indication of those undertaken by Ruddlesden geotechnical, but others are carried out. If your requirement is not readily identifiable on this web-site, please contact us as we may still be able to help you.

  • AGS
  • Constructionline
  • CSCS
  • SMAS
  • ECFC trust

Latest news

Recent projects

  • Latest news

    20 Aug 2026

    Start over-winter monitoring before it is too late!

    Look at these groundwater monitoring dataloggers! Whilst some loggers are still in the ground, monitoring groundwater levels all year round, these lot were taken out of their boreholes in May or June this year, once they had proven that they had recorded the seasonal groundwater peaks.As we come towards the end of a particularly dry summer, it might seem difficult to think about monitoring groundwater levels when conditions are at their wettest. But there is considerable benefit in starting over-winter groundwater monitoring sooner rather than later.. One year, the seasonal groundwater peak will be in November, and if the loggers don’t go in the ground before then, they won’t be able to record this!With Ruddlesden geotechnical, there is no financial benefit in delaying the start of over-winter groundwater monitoring; we charge the same to start monitoring in September as we do in December

    Start over-winter monitoring before it is too late!
    Start over-winter monitoring before it is too late!

  • Recent projects

    BRE DG 365 Soakaway Testing, Cornwall

    In-situ soakaway testing was undertaken in accordance with BRE DG 365, as part of a wider geotechnical investigation and contamination assessment for the residential redevelopment of land near Newquay, in Cornwall. The testing was undertaken using machine-excavated trial pits, with a tractor-towed water bowser used to provide the large volumes of water required for testing. Where practicable, Ruddlesden geotechnical use local plant hire firms and agricultural contractors for all of our ground investigation work. Ruddlesden geotechnical worked closely with the consulting engineers to ensure that sufficient information was provided for surface water drainage design. Due care was taken to appease local stakeholders, siting the test locations to minimise excessive disturbance to existing agricultural land and ensuring that all test locations were reinstated with the upmost care to mitigate against any future damage to agricultural plant and/ or livestock.

    13-nansledan-3

  • Recent projects

    Close Liaison with Local Authority and NHBC Saves Time and Money

    Ruddlesden geotechnical often liaise with the local authority’s environmental health officer (EHO) and, in some instances, the petroleum officer to gain additional background information about a site. The local authority often have additional information or insight as a result of previous developments within the same area. Ruddlesden geotechnical held favourable discussions with both the EHO and warranty provider (NHBC) regarding the risk of ground gases (carbon dioxide and methane) to a proposed residential development site in Shrewsbury, Shropshire. Initially, the warranty provider felt that in-situ ground gas monitoring was required to ascertain the risk of gases migrating from a nearby landfill site to beneath the site. However, following joint discussions with the EHO, it transpired that historical ground gas monitoring, both on and off the landfill, had shown that the landfill had a relatively low ground gas generation potential and so was unlikely to significantly affect the site. It was agreed that in lieu of in-situ monitoring, nominal ground gas protective measures, akin to full radon protective measures (a gas proof membrane and subfloor ventilation), could be adopted. On this occasion, this pragmatic approach saved the developer significant time and money.